Harmonics & Flicker Notes On Figures

 

A Discussion of the requirements of Harmonics and Flicker by David Mawdsley,  Laplace Instruments Ltd

 

Just when you thought it was all under control.....

          ............The latest elements in the EMC Compliance requirement.

 

In order to limit the ever increasing harmonic distortion imposed on the public mains supply the Harmonics and Flicker standards are to be introduced.

As from Jan 1st 2001, compliance with these Harmonics and Flicker standards becomes a mandatory part of the EMC Directive. 

This applies to all products within the scope of these standards.

 

Many products which are powered from the mains electricity supply take their power in a non-linear fashion. Current is drawn in pulses, rather than continuously.  See the typical power supply circuit,  fig 1. The current is drawn in pulses as the incoming mains voltage exceeds the voltage on the reservoir capacitors. See fig 2. The frequency content of the current waveform includes many harmonics of the fundamental frequency and as a consequence the supply system must deliver power at these multiples of 50Hz (harmonics) fig 3, a requirement which causes problems for the supply industry and distorts the voltage waveform, fig 4.

 

 

Standards:

 

Harmonics        IEC/EN61000-3-2 (replaces IEC555-2)

Flicker              IEC61000-3-3

 

Scope:

 

The Harmonics standard applies to ALL products that are:

·      Connected to the public mains supply

·      Rated at less than 16A per phase

·      Supplied at 230V nominal       (eg 110V as used in the US is not within the scope)

·      Are single or 3 phase.

·      An exception is any product for professional use rated above 1kW.

For rated currents from 16A to 75A per phase, IEC/EN61000-3-4 applies. This is not a mandatory standard. It includes a set of standard forms which can be submitted to the local electricity supplier in order to gain acceptance that the equipment can be connected.

 

The Flicker standard applies to all products that, in the opinion of the manufacturer, ‘could cause flicker’(!).   If you believe that any product is unlikely to cause flicker, then it does not need to be tested and can be judged compliant without further ado. However, the final version of the standard has possibly changed this view somewhat.

 

Why

 

A good question. The Americans think that we are all quite mad and have refused to have anything to do with these standards. However, the electricity supply companies are pushing strongly for the harmonics standard for much the same reasons that we use power factor correction. If large numbers of products draw significant current at, say, the third harmonic, then the electricity supply system will become stressed at frequencies it was not designed to deliver. The voltage waveform will become distorted and this may affect the performance of other equipment connected to the same network.

Although Flicker is a relatively rare phenomenon, it can be a serious health and safety hazard when it occurs, hence the standard.  It particularly affects those who may be prone to epileptic fits, and can cause distress in others.

 

Changes

 

Even before the Harmonics standard is introduced, a new version has been approved. This new version is likely to appear in the Official Journal in 18 months time, followed by a (probable) two year transition period.  This change is being introduced due to widespread dissatisfaction with the original standard, some features of which are confusing and subject to different interpretations.

In practice, industry in general and many test labs are already switching to the revised standard in anticipation of the formal introduction of the ‘mark II’ and in practice, both versions are used, but the Mk I will be dropped in due course.

The significant details of the revisions will be outlined later.

 

Implications

 

Having checked many different products, we find that many already comply. Those that are ‘at danger’ include products that take relatively high power or include power supply circuits delivering DC outputs. Phase angle power control devices may also be problematic.

Products that cause flicker are actually quite rare, but include lighting systems such as used in clubs and theaters, heavy drive systems and some heating systems.  However, the latest revision of this standard defines a max. Voltage change (dmax) and specifies a maximum value for this change. This covers single events such as inrush current on power up, nothing to do with ‘Flicker’!   This means that products must be tested for inrush currents, regardless of their potential for causing flicker.

 

 

The Harmonics Standard

 

To begin with:

·      The measurements are for current drawn at each harmonic frequency.

·      The standard covers up to the 40th harmonic (2KHz)

·      Each harmonic has a specified maximum in mA. (The limits)

·      You are judged compliant if you are below these limits.

·      THD (total harmonic distortion) is not used.

 

Now lets complicate it:

There are 4 classes, each with differing limits and other criteria:

A - covers all types of product NOT covered by the other three classes.

B - Portable equipment, eg. hand tools, lawnmowers etc...

C - Luminaires

D - Any equipment having a certain current waveshape. (Except phase angle controlled motor driven equipment)

The original intention of class D was to apply more stringent limits to equipment such as computers and other electronic devices that are used in large numbers and which draw current from the supply in a short pulse in each half cycle of the mains voltage.

See fig 5 for the selection flow diagram and fig 6 for the definition of the ‘special waveshape’.

 

The standard tabulates the limits for all these Classes.

 

Transitory harmonics occurring for less than 10s when equipment is switched on or initialised can be ignored.

 

And add more confusion:

·      If the harmonic level is fluctuating, you are allowed to exceed the limits by up to 150% for up to 10% of the time in any 2.5 minute period. This applies only to odd harmonics up to the 19th and even harmonics up to the 10th.

·      If the waveshape is Class D, but the power consumption exceeds 600W, then Class A applies. 

·      Class A and B have absolute limits, quoted in amps (or ma). Class C limits are calculated as a percentage of the fundamental current and Class D limits are calculated from the Wattage consumed by the product.

·      If Class D and the power consumption is below 75W, no limits apply, but ‘4 years after the implementation date of this standard’ (whatever that means!) this threshold is reduced to 50W.

Fig 7 shows how the selection of the class affects the limits that apply.

 

This causes various differing interpretations:

·      What class applies if the waveshape is Class D, but the power consumption varies above and below 600W.

·      When calculating the Class D limits, the limits are defined for ‘the rated load condition’. Is the rated wattage used, or the actual as calculated in real time under ‘rated load condition’, or simply measured once at the beginning of the test?

·      What is the implementation date of the standard?

 

Some of these ambiguities are clarified or eliminated in the proposed changes.......

 

Class D is redefined as applying to:

·      Personal computers and monitors

·      TV receivers and VCRs

·      Printers, fax machines and multimedia devices with a specified power less than 600W

The waveshape test has been eliminated.

Other products (not covered by Classes B and C now default to Class A.

The transition from 75W to 50W is postponed indefinitely.

 

Regarding the 600W cut-off point for Class D, the manufacturer is allowed to specify what power level is used in the calculation of the limits and selection of the Class. This power level must be within 10% of the actual.  This avoids situations where fluctuating power consumption may cause step changes in the harmonic limits during a test.

Note that then AC2000 harmonics analyser is fully compliant with the standard and copes with all the above factors, including automatic waveshape detection and both original and revised standards.

 

Test Technique

 

The conditions to be set for testing many types of equipment are defined in the standard. These include TV receivers, audio amps, lamps, ballasts, vacuum cleaners, washing machines, ovens and air conditioners.  Other products should be set so as to measure the maximum harmonic current for each successive harmonic in turn.  In practice, this is such a time consuming process that many test engineers simply set the product to the condition in which they produce the worst THD.

 

Any measurement of harmonic currents will be affected by the harmonic content of the incoming mains voltage. ‘Clean’ mains supplies are very rarely available from your wall outlet!

In order to accurately measure these harmonic currents taken by your product, a clean mains should be supplied. The standard specifies the maximum harmonic content of the supply voltage as follows (expressed as a ratio of the nominal test voltage):

           

Harmonic number

Maximum (%)

3

0.9

5

0.4

7

0.3

9

0.2

Even, 2 - 10

0.2

All, 11 - 40

0.1

 

Values for crest factor and phase angle are also specified.

Generally, these requirements will only be met if a ‘clean’ mains generator or source is used.  See the AC1000 power source. Fig 8 shows the arrangement generally used.

The harmonic currents are measured using a shunt, but the value of the shunt is not specified, it being such that the voltage drop due to the input current of the load is less than 0.15V

 

Flicker

 

The test for Flicker needs only to be applied to a product if it is likely to cause voltage fluctuations or flicker. (Fig 9).

Flicker is a measure of the amount of mains voltage fluctuation caused by a product which loads the mains cyclically. The aim of the standard is to reduce the likelihood that such fluctuations would cause perceptible flicker in lighting circuits which in turn can cause the onset of epileptic fits and other undesirable effects.

The standard is based on a considerable body of research, summarised in EN60868-0, which produces a technique for the statistical evaluation of voltage fluctuation. This evaluation leads to two parameters which defines the severity of the flicker.

 

Essentially, flicker severity is dependent on the amount of voltage change DV, and the frequency of the change.  The perception of flicker is very dependent on frequency, and is maximum at 8.8Hz. Thus a flickermeter includes measurement of DV and the application of a frequency weighting function. After statistical processing both a short term (Pst) and a long term flicker (Plt) indicators are derived.

Generally, Pst is evaluated over 10 minutes and Plt is evaluated over 2 hours.

The limit for Pst is 1.0 and for Plt is 0.65.

In addition the relative steady state voltage change shall not exceed 3%

The maximum relative voltage change shall not exceed 4%.  (This applies to single events such as inrush current)

 

Test technique

 

The product is fed from a zero impedance supply in series with a specified reference impedance. This impedance simulates the effective output impedance of the mains supply.

The voltage between Phase/neutral is measured on the product side of the reference impedance.  See fig 10 (3 phase) and fig 11 (single phase).  For single phase applications, the two parts of the reference impedance can be combined as shown in fig 12.

The product must be cycled or configured such that it produces the most unfavorable sequence of voltage changes.

Voltage fluctuations are recorded and:

- converted to an estimate of light variation from an incandescent bulb.

- an estimate of how this light variation is perceived by the eye/brain

- this variation is ‘weighted’ according to it’s frequency.

- This is converted to an instantaneous flicker reading. (Pinst))

- The instantaneous flicker reading is assessed over a 2.5 minute period and a Pst is obtained.

- From measurements over a longer period, a measure of Plt is derived.

 

The details of all the data processing and statistical evaluation involved in all this is quite beyond the limited mathematical understanding of the author, but if you really what to dig deeper, full explanations are given in 50868-0 and -1.  Good luck!

 

One problem with the above is that most testing will use the mains supply from the wall socket. See fig 13.  This probably has an output impedance similar to the reference impedance, thus the voltage change is likely to be doubled. The standard anticipates this by advising that the voltage drop  on the supply side of the reference impedance is also measured, and only if this is less than 20% of the volt drop on the output side of the reference impedance are the results valid. Quite what you are supposed to do if the change exceeds the 20% is not specified!

The AC2000 overcomes this problem by measuring the current rather than voltage, and converting this by calculation to volts drop as would be obtained across a perfect reference impedance as shown in fig 14.

 

The sting in the tail

 

As was stated earlier, Flicker testing is only conducted on products that may cause flicker. This effectively means that 99% of all products are outside the scope of this standard (hooray!).

However, in the final version which has now been ratified, the term dmax has been introduced.  This is the maximum voltage change

 

The implication is that any product that may have a relatively high inrush current could be construed as having to be tested under this standard. This suddenly expands the types of products which have to be tested very significantly. This change, mandatory from next month, appears to have caught most unawares. Even test labs have often omitted the ‘inrush current test’ on products that may now require it.

 

Main Page Comments / Feedback

If you have any comments, suggestions regarding our site or  require further product  information please use the feedback form

LAPLACE INSTRUMENTS LTD
3B, Middlebrook Way,
Holt Road, Cromer,
Norfolk, NR27 9JR,
UK
Tel: + 44 (0)1263 515160
Fax: + 44 (0)1263 512532
email:
tech@laplace.co.uk

Revised: 6 March, 2002
Copyright © Laplace Instruments 1998, all rights reserved